"You spend all this time in the Zone, you bring back a dog, the house needs decorating, your daughter's moving glasses again..."
Aleksandr Kaydanokvskiy, Anatoliy Solonitsyn, Nikolay Grinko
ph. Aleksandr Knyazhinsky
During STALKER I kept getting the feeling I was watching three boys in a primary school play pretending to be intrepidly voyaging through the perils of a mysterious 'zone', perils which they keep making up on the spot. Looking at some of the director's rather serious interviews, I doubt this was intentional (on responding to official criticism, he reportedly commented that he was only interested in the opinions of two people: Bergman and Bresson). Also I found the philosophical discussions between the trio frankly boring to someone of my limited intellect. Of course, being Tarkovsky, we are treated to some splendid elemental stuff: mist and dust, rain, an Anubis-like dog and most importantly, long shots of objects just beneath the surface of water. There was a silvery image of a well which was just spellbinding.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24103/24103711a96bb091c2349cf0f14f33bb636c5379" alt=""
Talking of water, the weird thing happened again that the weather outside (lots of rain and dripping guttering) seemed to emulate the film, and at one point I had to stop it to check whether the birdsong was ours or Tarkovsky's (it was his).
Remarkable photography by Aleksander Knyazhinsky replaced the destroyed 1977 footage; filmed in poisonous derelict Estonian factories which ultimately led to the deaths of Tarkovsky, his wife and one of their lead actors, giving the film a haunting resonance.
Artemyev's distinctive weird music mixes a familiar 70s synth string sound with a treated melody played on a Persian tar (a sort of ancient guitar) and a flute.
I was thinking this the least of my four Tarkovskys but find on reflection there was lots in it. It's also led me to Geoff Dyer's entertaining book
"Zona: A Book About a Film About a Journey to a Room".
Finally, an interesting word on style in the director's own words:
"If the regular length of a shot is increased, one becomes bored, but if you keep on making it longer, it piques your interest, and if you make it even longer a new quality emerges, a special intensity of attention."
A couple of P.S.s. Great directors and animals. If we take the triumvirate of Bresson, Bergman and Tarkovsky as the top of the heavyweights: well we know Bergman wasn't really interested in animals. Bresson clearly is. Dogs appear quite a bit in Tarkovsky:
Nostalghia also. It's important; I don't know why.
And: water
inside. The first thing (in T. documentary) that fascinated me, water running down the walls in
Mirror - these seem to recur in all his films, meaning? And rain. That long shot at the end, then it
rains. I love it! (Are we inside or outside?)
After-tangent. As Mark Cousins had kindly given away the endings of this and
Nostalghia, I was alert to the opening where an object appears to move across a table,
then we hear the train. The ending is an extension of this scene. Tarkovsky leaves absolutely everything open.